SEWARD - GIRDWOOD - KNIK - OLD SKWENTNA - RAINY PASS - ROHN - McGRATH - IDITAROD - KALTAG - GALENA- UNALAKLEET - GOLOVIN - NOME
 


DIRECTORY

HISTORIC OVERVIEW

TODAY'S
RECREATIONAL
OPPORTUNITIES
ALONG THE IDITAROD TRAIL

QUESTIONS
ABOUT TRAIL
USE

BECOME A
MEMBER

OUR
PURPOSE

CALENDAR OF
TRAIL EVENTS

INHT BOARD
MEMBERS & OFFICERS

LINKS

HOME

CONTACT US

INHT
SEWARD TO
NOME ROUTE


COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT
PLAN

INTRODUCTION

PROJECT BACKGROUND

HISTORIC OVERVIEW

REGIONAL
PROFILE

SIGNIFICANT
SITES &
ROUTES

MANAGEMENT
OPPORTUNITIES

TRAIL MAP

PRIMARY
ROUTES &
CONNECTING
ROUTES

FROM
THE PAST

 
 











 

Project Background

 

A. National Trails System Act

The national Trails System Act, Public Law 90-543, was approved on October 2, 1968. The Act States:

In order to provide for the ever increasing outdoor recreation needs of an expanding population and in order to promote public access to, travel within, and enjoyment and appreciation of the open-air, outdoor areas of the Nation, trails should be established (i) primarily, near the urban areas of the Nation, and (ii) secondarily, within established scenic areas more remotely located.

The original Act instituted a national system of recreation and scenic trails, designated the Appalachian and Pacific Crest Trails as the initial components of the National Scenic Trail System, and prescribed method by which, and standards according to which, additional components may be added to the system. The Act directed that 14 specified routes would be studied for the purpose of determining the possibility and desirability of designating each as a national scenic trail. One route named for study was the “Gold Rush Trails in Alaska.” No further identification of the route was included in the original Act.

B. Alaska Gold Rush Trail Study

The primary task of the Alaska Gold Rush Study Team, formed in September 1973, was to determine specific trails that should be studied as a basis of appropriate proposals for additional national scenic trails. The study team, chaired by the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, was made up of various Federal, State, and local government representatives.

In September 1977, the study team made its recommendations to the President and to Congress in The Iditarod Trail (Seward-to-Nome Route) and Other Gold Rush Trails. The team recommended that the 2,037-mile Iditarod Trail system be included in the National Trails System and designated as a National Historic Trail.

C. Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race

In March of 1973, the Iditarod Trail Committee staged the first IDITAROD TRAIL SLED DOG RACE between Anchorage and Nome. Twenty-two mushers successfully retraced the steps of men and dogs from over 50 years earlier by traveling overland to Nome. The event that year captured the imagination of many Alaskans. In the years to follow, interest in the event would spread to many parts of the world as mushers from many different countries began to enter the competition. Billed as a 1,049-mile race each year, it actually exceeds that distance, as well as alternates between a southern and a northern race route.

Some variation of the northern race route has been used by the Iditarod Race Committee in 1973, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1978, 1980, 1982, 1984 and 1986. This race route generally follows Trail segments identified on the Iditarod NHT system.

Some variation of the southern race route has been used in the Iditarod Sled Dog Race in each odd-numbered year between 1977 and 1985. This race route generally follows Trail segments Identified on the Iditarod NHT system, with two exceptions. Normally the southern race route leads from the town of Iditarod to the villages of Shageluk, Anvik, and Grayling, and then follows the Yukon River to the village of Kaltag. (This portion of the southern race route, though not originally listed in the Alaska Gold Rush Trails Study Report as a potential addition to the Trail system, is certainly eligible for inclusion into the National Trail System and should be added at some later date.” In 1981, the Iditarod

 

Trail Committee ran the event through the Anvik River and Chirosky River drainages, thereby bypassing the Yukon River and the village Kaltag.

Without a doubt, the excitement and success of the annual Iditarod Sled Dog Race and the organization of people behind that race helped the once-abandoned Iditarod Trail attain national recognition and National Trail status.

D. National Historic Trails

The Seward-Nome Route became one of the first National Historic Trails selected when Public Law 95-625 (The National Parks and Recreation Act) was signed by the President on November 10, 1978. This Act, amending the National Trails System Act, provided for and specifically named the Iditarod as a National Historic Trail. It mandated the following actions:

  1. The Iditarod NHT shall be administered by the Secretary of the Interior
  2. The Secretary of the Interior shall submit to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, a “comprehensive plan” for the management and use of the Trail. The comprehensive plan shall include, but not be limited to:
    • The identification of the historic Trail system and side and connecting trails.
    • The identification of all significant natural, historic, and cultural resources to be preserved.
    • Specific objectives and pratices to be observed in the management of the Trail.
    • Details of any anticipated cooperative agreements to be consummated.
    • Procedures for establishing a uniform marker, marking the Trail, and providing markers to cooperating agencies.
    • Identifying access needs to the Trail where appropriate and identifying acquisition needs for significant sites or segments.
  3. An Advisory Council be formed with the following members to be included.
    • A member of each Federal or independent agency administering land through which the Trail route passes.
    • A member to represent the State, appointed by the Governor.
    • One or more members appointed to represent private organizations and individual landowners or land users who have an established and recognized interest in the Trail.
  4. The secretary shall select necessary rights-of-way for the Trail after obtaining advice and assistance of the State of Alaska, local governments, private organizations, and landowners and land users concerned.
  5. Maps of the Iditarod NHT shall be kept on file and available for public inspection in the office of the Director, National Park Service, Washington D.C.


The National Trails System Act specifically authorized and designated “The Iditarod National Historic Trail” as the “route of approximately two thousand miles extending from Seward, Alaska to Nome, Alaska…, follwing the routes as depicted on maps identified as ‘Seward-Nome Trail’” in the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation’s September 1977 study report. The route is actually a trail system made up of a primary trail route connecting Seward and Nome, and over
thirteen hundred miles of other trails which connect the Alaska Road Commission’s Seward-to-Nome Route with gold strikes, communities, and access points.

E. Comprehensive Management Plan

The Secretary of the Interior delegated the responsibility of preparing a comprehensive management plan for the Iditarod NHT to the Bureau of Land Management. This responsibility was eventually assigned to the Anchorage District Office of the Bureau.

The project team, which was assembled between June 1979 and September 1981, consisted of a project leader, outdoor recreation planner, historians, historic architect, project assistants, archeologists, and landscape architects. A writer/editor, graphic artists, realty specialists, public affairs specialists and others also gave invaluable assistance. The project team was also assisted by other Federal, State, and local government representatives and private individuals in historical research and in preparation of a September 1981 Draft Comprehensive Management Plan.

The project team, disbanded after completion of the Draft Comprehensive Management Plan, accomplished various tasks during their assignment.

    • Field inventories were conducted during 1980 and 1981 to locate and evaluate historical sites and segments.
    • State and Federal records and private collections throughout the United States and Canada were researched for Iditarod-related documents, photographs and maps. Maps and photographs collected were cataloged.
    • Site information files were established to compile known information on each historic site and segment which were indexed to the Alaska Historical Resources Survey (AHRS) system as maintained by the State of Alaska.
    • Maps at the 1:63,360 scale depicting historic site and Iditarod Trail segment locations were produced by the project staff.
    • Informal conversations as well as formal oral history interviews with people who recollect the days of the Iditarod Trail were recorded, annotated, and contributed to the Alaska State Historical Library in Juneau.
    • An extensive public involvement program designed to inform and involve citizens in the planning process was carried out.
    • A Draft Comprehensive Management Plan was prepared for transmittal to the Secretary of the Interior.
    • A document entitled Resources Inventories was completed. This document summarized the recommendations of the individual resource specialists as of September 1981. (Copies of Resources Inventories are available form the Anchorage District Office, Bureau of Land Management.)

In August 1984 the Anchorage District was directed to revise the Comprehensive Management Plan for the Iditarod NHT. This revision was necessary primarily because of budget and organizational implications found in the 1981 draft plan.

F. Advisory Council

On January 14, 1981, the Secretary of Interior officially appointed a twenty-member Advisory Council to assist the Bureau of Land Management in the formulation of the Comprehensive Management Plan. The original Advisory Council, appointed for a two-year term, met on March 6,1981, and May 7-8, 1981. It reviewed the BLM’s management proposal and approved the recommendations and management approach contained within the draft document. The membership of the original Advisory Council is shown in Appendix 1. Minutes of Advisory Council meetings are on file at the Anchorage District Office, Bureau of Land Management.

This Advisory Council will be reinstated once the expired charter is replaced with a new charter signed by the Secretary. The main objective of the new Advisory Council will be to advise the Secretary and all Iditarod NHT managers and cooperators in the implementation of this comprehensive management plan.

G. Management Goals

“National historic trails shall have as their purpose the identification and protection of the historic route and its historic remnants and artifacts for public use and enjoyment” (Section 3 (c), National Trails System Act, as amended).

The primary goal of this comprehensive plan is to establish a common guide which will be used to promote the preservation, enjoyment, use, and appreciation of the historic route of the Iditarod Trail. This plan identifies the trails and sites making up the historic Trail system and recommends non-binding possible management actions for protecting significant segments, historic remnants, and artifacts for public use and enjoyment.

In addition, the plan identifies the opportunities for outdoor recreation and public enjoyment which are compatible with the integrity of the historic route and are not destructive to the cultural and natural resources associated with the Iditarod Trail.

This comprehensive management plan proposes a cooperative management system for the Iditarod NHT which is based on a PARTNERSHIP of: 1) the Federal land managers already responsible for sections of NHT; 2) State, local, and private landowners/managers who have entered into cooperative agreements supporting the historic Trail management concept; and, 3) the Trail management organization(s), who will accept major responsibilities for carrying out on-the-ground work on the Trail. The Bureau of Land Management will be responsible for the COORDINATION of efforts of all Trail partners.

H. Management Objectives

Components of the Iditarod NHT should be managed by the respective land managers or owners in a manner consistent with the intent of the enabling legislation so as to achieve the following broad, long term objectives:

    1. The Iditarod NHT should be managed under a cooperative agreement system, involving Federal agencies, the State of Alaska, local governments, private Trail organizations, and an Advisory Council, using the Comprehensive Management Plan as a common guide.
    2. Encourage and assist the “Iditarod Trail Blazers” a coalition of Trail organizations and interest groups, to participate as a working partner in the management of the Iditarod NHT.
    3. On behalf of the Secretary of the Interior, use the Bureau of Land Management’s Anchorage District Office as liaison for Iditarod NHT matters.
    4. Utilize the Iditarod NHT Advisory Council for consultation with respect to matters related to the Trail.
    5. In order to increase public use and enjoyment, all Trail segments identified for active management should be managed to protect and interpret their historic values, and should be identified by the placement of uniform markers.
    6. Public use of Trail segments should be encouraged, protected, and managed to the extent that such use does not impact the historic values of the Iditarod NHT. Rights-of-way, easements, management corridors, cooperative agreements, and access improvements will all be used to meet this objective.
    7. Non-federal sites and segments should be included in the Iditarod NHT through cooperative agreements as soon as possible.

    8. A full range of publications, maps, and other materials interpreting the Trail and the component sites and segments should be made available to the public in order to increase public appreciation and understanding of the Iditarod NHT system. This information and education program should be a cooperative effort of Trail managers and volunteer groups.

    9. Certain segments and all historic sites identified in Appendix 5 should be further evaluated for possible nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. This should be done prior to making any binding management decisions which eventually may include various degrees of values. It is recommended that Level 1 and 2 sites be given the highest priority. Detailed management and use plans for accomplishing this objective should be prepared by the appropriate land management agency.

    10. Nominations to the National Register of Historic Places should be by a thematic group format submission. If not possible, then each managing agency should consider undertaking site-specific nominations of the site recommended.

      .

       






TOP NEWS

PROJECTS
MEETINGS &
TRAINING INFORMATION
 
Attention Teachers
Order Iditarod Educational Material FREE
Click Here
 


INHT
SEWARD TO
NOME ROUTE


COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT
PLAN

INTRODUCTION
PROJECT BACKGROUND
HISTORIC OVERVIEW
REGIONAL
PROFILE
SIGNIFICANT
SITES &
ROUTES
MANAGEMENT
OPPORTUNITIES
TRAIL
MAP
PRIMARY
ROUTES &
CONNECTING
ROUTES
FROM
THE PAST
 
 
 








 



Copyright 2002 Idiatrodhistorictrail.com
All Rights Reserved
Note: These pages are best viewed
with a 4.0 or better browser

Designed and Maintained by Daily's Web Design
http://www.dailyswebdesign.com
Questions about the website?
Contact the
webmaster@iditarodnationalhistorictrail.org